Stand up upward for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
Nosotros need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

Defund Planned Parenthood

"I would defund it because of the abortion factor, which they say is three per centum. I don't know what percentage it is. They say information technology'south 3 percent. But I would defund it, because I'm pro-life."

Trump-O-Meter

Trump rule change prods Planned Parenthood to forgo federal funds

After a string of setbacks, opponents of abortion chalked up a significant victory in 2019 with the enactment of a federal regulation to prevent a major blazon of federal funding from reaching entities that provide abortion services.

At issue was Title X funding, a Department of Health and Human Services grant programme that targets lower-income Americans who are facing unintended pregnancies or seeking family planning services.

The Trump assistants enacted a rule that effectively said that any facility receiving federal Title X funding cannot also be an ballgame provider. Previously, abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood could receive Championship X funds equally long as the funds were only used for non-abortion services.

"When this rule was instituted, Planned Parenthood was faced with having to choose between continuing to receive the Title Ten funding for family planning intendance or standing to provide abortion services at some of their clinics," said Gretchen Eastward. Ely, a professor at the State Academy of New York-Buffalo's School of Social Piece of work.

In August 2019, 1 month before the rule was scheduled to take effect, Planned Parenthood decided to stop taking Title X rather than discontinuing abortion services. A federal appeals court upheld the rule'southward legality in Feb 2020.

Samuel Lau, director of federal advancement communications for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said the rule "has left many states without any directly grantees or with serious gaps in care in the program" after Planned Parenthood stopped taking funds.

On another front, the Trump administration made progress targeting the other major source of government funding for Planned Parenthood: Medicaid, the federal-state programme that provides health coverage for depression-income Americans.

The administration has encouraged states to seek permission to bar Planned Parenthood from participating in their state Medicaid programs. In January 2020, the assistants approved Texas' request to implement a Medicaid family planning program that bars patients from accessing care at Planned Parenthood or other entities that likewise provide abortion.

The Texas instance represented "the kickoff fourth dimension the federal government has immune a state to explicitly waive Medicaid'south free choice of provider for family planning provision," Lau said.

In practical terms, this did not change anything on the ground in Texas, because vi years before, the state had launched a fully state-funded program that effectively barred access to Planned Parenthood through the program. But the approval of Texas' plan "could open the floodgates for other anti-ballgame politicians to follow suit," Lau said, noting that similar waivers are pending from Idaho, South Carolina, and Tennessee.

Information technology's important to note these changes take been in the regulatory realm rather than passed by Congress. Abortion rights advocates say that a victory by presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden this fall could reverse these policies.

For now, however, we rate this a Promise Kept.

Email interview with Samuel Lau, director of federal advocacy communications for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, June 24, 2020

Email interview with Jennifer Popik, director of federal legislation at National Correct to Life, June 22, 2020

Email interview with Gretchen Due east. Ely, professor at the Land University of New York-Buffalo's School of Social Work, June 22, 2020

Read Virtually Our Process

With efforts in Congress unsuccessful, attention turns to regulatory process

Over the past year, President Donald Trump and his Republican allies accept failed in several efforts to defund Planned Parenthood.

As we've noted, federal dollars do non actually fund abortions. A longstanding provision known as the Hyde Amendment excludes Planned Parenthood and other medical providers from using federal dollars to pay for most abortion services, except in instances of rape, incest or when a woman's life is in danger.

Abortion opponents debate that even these types of federal payments hateful that the government is indirectly supporting ballgame, then they have pursued various legal and regulatory approaches to shut down the federal funding streams that currently back up organizations like Planned Parenthood.

Indeed, estimates bear witness that the arrangement receives nigh twoscore pct of its funding from the government. Planned Parenthood receives more than $500 million in combined state and federal government funds.

Planned Parenthood gets near of its funding through Medicaid reimbursements and from Title X, a Health and Man Services grant program that funds comprehensive family unit planning services.

Those who support defunding Planned Parenthood cheered when Congress and Trump in 2017 effectively overturned an Obama assistants rule that had been written to prevent state and local governments from pulling federal funding from Planned Parenthood and other clinics.

But Kinsey Hasstedt, a senior policy manager with the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive-problems enquiry organisation, said this move was more symbolic than something with a solid legal upshot. The question will play out in the courts.

"In repealing that regulation, Congress and President Trump surely sought to send a message inviting state efforts to exclude Planned Parenthood and other like providers from Title X," she said. "That doesn't hateful states actually have the legal correct to do so."

Meanwhile, other developments in the past year take been less favorable to those advocating for defunding.

In the Republican effort to "repeal and supersede" the Affordable Care Act, provisions to effectively defund Planned Parenthood were typically included, notably in the "skinny repeal" bill that came close to passing the Senate. But in the terminate, none of the bills passed.

In the jitney spending nib that Congress passed and Trump signed in March 2018, defunding supporters were unable to attach a provision to curb federal funding for Planned Parenthood and groups like it.

And then, in August, the Senate voted down an subpoena to a spending bill sponsored by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., that would accept shut downward federal funding for Planned Parenthood. The amendment failed, 45-48, with all Democrats voting confronting, joined by Republicans Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

Finally, in December, the Supreme Court decided non to hear a pair of cases related to land efforts designed to go along groups like Planned Parenthood from receiving federal funding. In the cases at issue, states argued against the rights of individuals to legally challenge state moves to curb federal funding, including Medicaid dollars, to Planned Parenthood.

In the absenteeism of a high court ruling, lower court rulings stand, and they by and large sided with the rights of individuals to challenge state actions. So the Supreme Courtroom's non-decision was seen as a victory for the Planned Parenthood side.

Unlike the other developments listed hither, the court's determination was outside the purview of the Trump assistants, only information technology could have had a substantial bear upon, said Sara Rosenbaum, a health law and policy professor at George Washington Academy's Milken Institute Schoolhouse of Public Health.

"If the court had agreed to hear their appeals and had ruled in their favor, my conservative estimate is that half the states would take eliminated Planned Parenthood as a qualified provider" for federal funds, she said.

Now that Democrats have taken command of the U.South. House of Representatives, defunding Planned Parenthood through Congress is even more unlikely.

For at present, the administration hopes to defund Planned Parenthood through a regulatory process.

One move involves proposed regulations for Championship X funding that would, among other things, block funds for Planned Parenthood and other providers that offer ballgame services.

"Because Planned Parenthood serves so many Title X family planning patients -- about 41 percent of the 4 1000000 who receive Title Ten services -- if Championship 10 becomes restricted only to providers who do non offer abortions, it would cut about $50 one thousand thousand in funding from Planned Parenthood, and that would be existent progress towards de-funding them," said Gretchen E. Ely, an associate professor in the University at Buffalo's School of Social Work.

Another endeavor involves proposed administration regulations to 2 separate monthly bills to exist sent to people who bought Affordable Care Act marketplace plans that include abortion coverage  -- 1 bill for the bulk of their health coverage, and a 2d pecker exclusively for ballgame services.

That adds actress hassle for people who use ACA plans to get services at Planned Parenthood, offering an indirect avenue to de-fund the group and reduce coverage of ballgame generally, Ely said.

If either regulation is finalized, opponents are expected to challenge them in court.

"From our perspective, it seems that the administration has done everything it could" to defund Planned Parenthood, said David N. O'Steen, executive director of National Correct to Life, an anti-ballgame group.

The lesser line is that the Trump assistants's chances of conveying through on this hope are smaller now that Democrats control the U.S. House of Representatives. If the regulatory proposals are finalized, we'll reconsider, simply for now, we rate this promise Stalled.

Washington Mail, "Supreme Court declines to review rulings that blocked efforts to cease Planned Parenthood funding," December 10, 2018

H.J.Res. 43 -- Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of championship 5, United states of america Code, of the concluding rule submitted by Secretary of Health and Human Services relating to compliance with title X requirements by project recipients in selecting subrecipients.

Kaiser Family Foundation, "Abortion Coverage in the ACA Marketplace Plans: The Impact of Proposed Rules for Consumers, Insurers and Regulators," Dec. 21, 2018

Kaiser Family Foundation, "Proposed Changes to Title Ten: Implications for Women and Family unit Planning Providers," Nov. 21, 2018

New York Times, "Trump Signs Law Taking Aim at Planned Parenthood Funding," April thirteen, 2017

Washington Mail, "Backside closed doors, Trump signs bill allowing states to strip federal family unit planning funds from abortion providers," April 13, 2017

Washington Postal service, "Senate easily defeats measure to defund Planned Parenthood," Aug. 23, 2018

Washington Post, "Supreme Courtroom declines to review rulings that blocked efforts to finish Planned Parenthood funding," Dec. 10, 2018

PolitiFact, "Pittenger says bill doesn't designate money for Planned Parenthood," Apr 6, 2018

Email interview with Gretchen East. Ely, associate professor in the University at Buffalo's School of Social Work, Jan. iii, 2018

Email interview with Sara Rosenbaum, health law and policy professor at George Washington Academy's Milken Found School of Public Wellness, Jan. 3, 2018

Email interview with Kinsey Hasstedt, senior policy director at the Guttmacher Institute, Jan 3, 2018

Interview with Andrew Taverrite, press secretary with Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Jan. 4, 2018

Interview with David N. O'Steen, executive director of National Right to Life, January. four, 2018

Read About Our Process

Trump's attempts to defund Planned Parenthood met with roadblocks

As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump promised to defund Planned Parenthood. That has all the same to happen.

Trump joined other Republicans in opposition to federal funding for the health services provider on the grounds that Planned Parenthood helps some patients obtain abortions.

"I would defund it because of the abortion cistron, which they say is 3 percent," Trump said on Feb. 25, 2016. "I don't know what percentage it is. They say information technology's 3 percent. But I would defund information technology, because I'm pro-life. But millions of women are helped by Planned Parenthood."

Federal funding does not really fund abortions. The Hyde Amendment excludes Planned Parenthood and others from using federal dollars to pay for most abortion services, except in instances of rape, incest or when a adult female's life is in danger. Ballgame opponents argue the government is tacitly supporting abortion by funding non-ballgame services.

And then how far has Trump come in keeping his promise?

First, information technology's important to note that Planned Parenthood is non a line particular on the budget, then it can't simply be crossed out. Planned Parenthood gets most of its funding through Medicaid reimbursements for preventive intendance and some from Title X, a Wellness and Human Services grant program that funds comprehensive family planning services.

Trump'southward proposed 2018 budget, which he sent Congress in May, called for denying funding, whether through Medicaid or Title Ten, to any group that performs abortions, including Planned Parenthood, even if that money isn't going toward abortions. The House and Senate versions of the budget don't include that linguistic communication.

Simply the best shot Trump had at getting rid of the Medicaid reimbursements was through failed wellness care reform.

The GOP health care neb would have effectively blocked Planned Parenthood from securing reimbursements from Medicaid for a yr. Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Ak., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, who alongside Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., killed the bill in the Senate, had cited Planned Parenthood funding as one of the conditions of their support for the nib.

The Wellness and Human being Services Department has put all grants provided through Title Ten up for renewal in June 2018. Terms for grants, which have not however been announced, are expected to set more than stringent anti-abortion conditions for the funding. Heading the department is Teresa Manning, is a prominent anti-abortion activist.

The Trump assistants is working to cut back admission to abortion, just his vow to cutting funding for Planned Parenthood has been met with roadblocks so far. For now, we rate this promise Stalled.

Presidency.UCSB.edu, Republican Candidates Debate in Houston, Texas, February. 25, 2016

Electronic mail interview with Steven Cheung, White Firm spokesman, Dec. 19, 2017

Phone interview with Erica Sackin, Planned Parenthood spokeswoman, Dec. twenty, 2017

WhiteHouse.gov, A New Foundation for American Greatness FY 2018, May 23, 2017

WhiteHouse.gov, Fact sheet: The President's financial twelvemonth 2018 budget overview

Congress.gov, Resolution 71, Oct. xix, 2017

The Hill, Abortion providers brace for new Trump funding fight, November. 24, 2017

Mother Jones, Trump Simply Picked a Contraception Skeptic to Head Federal Family Planning Efforts, May 1, 2017

Politico, Fate of Planned Parenthood funding tied to Senate moderates, Apr xi, 2016

NPR, Here'due south What GOP Beak Would (And Wouldn't) Change For Women's Wellness Care, March 10, 2017

Washington Post, Congressional wellness care nib 'defunds' Planned Parenthood, May 4, 2017

Read About Our Process

Congress moving ahead with plans to cut Medicaid payments, grant money to Planned Parenthood

During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump joined other Republicans in vowing to terminate federal funding for Planned Parenthood, solely because the health services provider helps some patients obtain abortions.

At a GOP debate in Houston, Trump responded to criticism from Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida that Trump had defended Planned Parenthood.

"Every bit far as Planned Parenthood is concerned, I'k pro-life. I'm totally against abortion, having to exercise with Planned Parenthood," Trump said on February. 25, 2016. "Just millions and millions of women — cervical cancer, breast cancer — are helped by Planned Parenthood. So you lot tin can say whatsoever yous want, but they have millions of women going through Planned Parenthood that are helped greatly. And I wouldn't fund it.

"I would defund it because of the ballgame factor, which they say is three percent. I don't know what percentage information technology is. They say it'southward three percent. Simply I would defund information technology, considering I'm pro-life. But millions of women are helped by Planned Parenthood."

WHY HE'South PROMISING Information technology

Politicians and groups opposed to abortion rights attacked Planned Parenthood after a serial of heavily edited videos appeared in the summer of 2015.

Those videos, from the grouping Center for Medical Progress, purported to prove officials from Planned Parenthood discussing how the organization illegally sells tissue from aborted fetuses for profit.

Planned Parenthood is allowed to donate tissue to research firms for a procurement fee. More than a dozen states launched investigations into Planned Parenthood practices and found no evidence of illegal tissue harvesting and sales.

Afterward on,  2 abortion opponents from the center were indicted on record-tampering and organ-trafficking charges. The pair reportedly used fake California commuter'southward licenses to hash out buying organs from Planned Parenthood. The charges were eventually dropped.

Nevertheless, Republicans cited Planned Parenthood by name equally an organization the party opposed when it adopted its new party platform in July 2016.

"Nosotros oppose the use of public funds to perform or promote abortion or to fund organizations, similar Planned Parenthood, so long as they provide or refer for elective abortions or sell fetal trunk parts rather than provide healthcare," the platform read.

WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN

By constabulary, the federal government is not allowed to employ taxpayer funds for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the female parent. But opponents argue money is fungible, so whatever funds going to Planned Parenthood support the group's abortion services.

The GOP has tried for years to strip funding from the organization, simply were stymied. President Barack Obama in 2016 vetoed one such beak.

Now with majorities in both the House and Senate, and a Republican president, conservatives can push through provisions that Democrats had previously been able to oppose.

Congress has been advancing filibuster-proof legislation that would begin the dismantling parts of the Affordable Care Deed. A mensurate to stop grants and Medicaid reimbursements to Planned Parenthood could exist fastened to that resolution.

Considering of the nature of the measure, Democrats would non be able to forestall the resolution from passing on their own.

HOW MUCH Information technology Volition COST

It'southward hard to say exactly how much coin Planned Parenthood gets from the federal authorities.

The organization does not go paid directly by Washington, but rather is reimbursed for services provided to Medicaid patients and through Title X grants for family planning services. Services covered under these sources include HIV and STD tests, pregnancy tests, cancer screenings, birth command and more.

Planned Parenthood's 2014-15 almanac report says affiliates received $553.7 1000000 in government grants and reimbursements that fiscal year. That's 43 percent of the grouping's total upkeep. The rest of its $1.3 billion nationwide budget comes from donations and non-government sources.

But Medicaid is a joint state and federal plan, so it's hard to tell just how much money came from which source. It's besides tough to tell how state governments would respond to having federal funds cutting off for reimbursements and grants.

The grouping notes that roughly lx percent of its 2.5 million or so annual clients are Medicaid patients. They would potentially be hard-pressed to find a replacement provider for Planned Parenthood'southward services.

WHAT'S Continuing IN HIS WAY

While Trump has signed a alphabetic character promising to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood while it still provides abortions, he has indicated he welcomes other services the group provides.

Some Trump voters also have expressed dismay at the prospect of eroding Planned Parenthood's ability to provide services, and the grouping itself has been girding for a bitter campaign to maintain services.

Furthermore, Republican senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine take indicated they may oppose a final measure that singles out Planned Parenthood.

POSSIBLE TIMELINE

In 2017, the Senate has already voted for the budget resolution, 51-48, with Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky voting nay because the measure did not remainder the budget and added to the deficit.

The House agreed to information technology by a vote of 227-198, with nine Republicans voting against it.

No Democrats voted for the measure.

Congress now will examine parts of the resolution in a process called reconciliation. While some Republicans — including Trump — have indicated they want a replacement to the Affordable Care Act before it's repealed, Planned Parenthood could all the same conceivably lose its federal funding if Congress includes the provision in its final resolution.

We rate this promise In The Works.

PunditFact, "PolitiFact Sheet: 8 things to know almost the Planned Parenthood controversy," Aug. five, 2015

New York Times, "Obama Vetoes Pecker to Repeal Wellness Law and Cease Planned Parenthood Funding," Jan. 8, 2016

New York Times, "2 Abortion Foes Behind Planned Parenthood Videos Are Indicted," January. 25, 2016

Donald Trump, "Republican Candidates Debate in Houston, Texas," Feb. 25, 2016

New York Times, "Last Charges Dropped Against Abortion Foes in Making of Planned Parenthood Video," July 26, 2016

Susan B. Anthony List, Trump letter on Pro-Life Coalition, September 2016

CNN, "Effort to defund Planned Parenthood threatens Obamacare repeal," Jan. 6, 2017

Time, "Republicans Have Upper Hand in Fight to Defund Planned Parenthood," Jan. 7, 2017

NPR, "What You lot Demand To Know Virtually The Coming Fight Over Planned Parenthood Funding," Jan. 7, 2017

The Loma, "Voters will advantage GOP for defunding Planned Parenthood," Jan. ten, 2017

Kaiser Health News, "GOP Vows To Defund Planned Parenthood. Reality Makes That Hard.," Jan. 17, 2017

USA Today, "I voted for Trump, non confronting Planned Parenthood: Column," Jan. 17, 2017

Washington Mail, "Planned Parenthood could exist first prey of Obamacare repeal efforts," Jan. 18, 2017

Planned Parenthood, 2014-fifteen Annual Report, accessed Jan. 19, 2017

GOP Convention 2016, "Republican Platform 2016," accessed Jan. 19, 2017

Congress.gov, Southward.Con.Res.3, accessed Jan. 19, 2017

Interview with Devon Kearns, Planned Parenthood spokeswoman, Jan. 18, 2017

Read Near Our Process